Scientonomy: The Theory of Scientific Change

The semester soon is coming to it’s end, which means that there would only be one session left. But, since there are so many people interested in giving a talk, there will be an extra session.
Therefore we will meet again next week on the 13th of June at 20:00 at WUK to listen to Patrick’s talk about “Scientonomy: The Theory of Scientific Change”, a construction of a historically motivated attempt to understand how and why scientific theories and methods change in time.

For additional material see:

As a starting point the following lecture on “The laws of scientific change”
https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=BBBxJ8yYrsg

The Encyclopedia of Scientonomy
https://www.scientowiki.com/Main_Page

The first book chapter of Hakob Barseghyan’s Book “The Laws of scientific change”,  provides a good overview. In order to obtain the book chapter, contact e.schwarzhans(at)gmx.at

Advertisements

Could the physical world be emergent instead of fundamental, and why should we ask?

The next Naturwissenschaftscafé will take place on Wednesday the 6th of June at 20:00 in Wuk. This time Marius will give us an introduction into the paper “Could the physical world be emergent instead of fundamental, and why should we ask?”, which was published by his supervisor Markus Müller.

There are two versions of this paper, a long one and a short one. Both are on the arxiv under the following links:

https://arxiv.org/pdf/1712.01816.pdf  (short version)

https://arxiv.org/pdf/1712.01826.pdf  (Full version)

And additionally you can find a presentation Markus Müller gave about this topic under:
http://mpmueller.net/theory.html

 

The fundamental energy cost of time measurement

The next Naturwissenschaftscafé will take place on Wednesday the 23rd at 20:00 in Wuk. This time Manu will talk about his master thesis on “The fundamental energy cost of time measurement” . Since he is not finished yet he will give you an introduction into Autonomous quantum clocks and show you what he did so far. For the non-physicist of you: He will try to keep it very basic so you can join the discussion as well.

  • If you are interested in the clock model and the figures of merit  he uses, it is quite instructive to read:
    Autonomous quantum clocks: does thermodynamics limit our ability to measure time? https://arxiv.org/pdf/1609.06704.pdf
  • For those of you interested in quantum thermodynamics in general he recommends:
    The role of quantum information in thermodynamics — a topical review https://arxiv.org/pdf/1505.07835.pdf

 

The physical interpretation of probability and the quantum theory

The next Naturwissenschaftscafé will take place on the 9th of May at 20:00 in Wuk. This time Flavio will talk about The physical interpretation of probability and the quantum theory. You may find following suggested literature helpful:

  • Book:
    “Philosophy and Probability” by Timothy Childers (pp. 33-36)
  • Extended conference paper:
    “The physical motivations for a propensity interpretation of probability, and the reactions of the community of quantum physicists” by Flavio

In order to get one of the above texts please contact e.schwarzhans(at)gmx.at .

Learning & Education

In our next meeting, on the 25th of April at 20:00 in Café Tunnel, Lucas will  discuss the wide topics learning & education. Therefore, he will give a rather short impulse mainly inspired by the neurobiologist Gerald Hüther. On his homepage (http://www.gerald-huether.de/) you can find a vast amount of well organized literature and talks. Especially in German, Hüther is a great speaker and Lucas highly recommends his talks. Concerning his talk, Lucas suggest the following two articles:

 

Why (not) vote? – A mathematical approach to the theory of Elections, grassroots democracy & the challenges of decision making in big groups

The next meeting will be on the 11th of April at 20:00, as always in Café Tunnel.
This times topic is Why (not) vote? – A mathematical approach to the theory of Elections, grassroots democracy & the challenges of decision making in big groups” and will be presented by Claude.

Abstract:
According to the current democratic Ideal elections ought to reflect the “will of the people”. We will examine current election methods and discuss alternative societal designs. Both will prove  to be challenging.

Basic considerations:

  • What is an election?
  • How do formal rules influence elections?
  • Can there be fair elections and how should they look like?

All of this will be analyzed using established mathematical methods of the field of economics (so called Public Choice Theory). Apart from classical philosophical-idealistic democracy theories we will see that fair elections constitute a complex as well as a hardly reachable ideal.
At the end of the discussion probably more new questions will have appeared, than we answered. On that account we will have established an exceptional and differentiated point of view on, up to this point accepted, fundamental assumptions of our society.

Suggested literature (in German):
Mathematik der Wahl: Das Arrow-Theorem – Karl Geller

  • Basic: Chapter 5.1 will probably be covered by the Talk.
  • Bonus: Chapter 5.2 bonus material.

Since the literature is neither published nor otherwise available please contact Manu (e.schwarzhans@gmx.at) in order to get it.

Bohmian Mechanics

The topic of our next meeting will be Bohmian Mechanics  and will be presented by Gerd. This is especially fortunate, since the next guest at our lecture series will be Antony Valentini (see https://physik.univie.ac.at/veranstaltungen/events-detailansicht/news/antony-valentini-us-the-de-broglie-bohm-pilot-wave-theory/ ), who will talk about the The De Broglie-Bohm Pilot-Wave Theory.
As always, the meeting will take place at the Tunnel. This time we will meet on Tuesday 13.3. at 20:00.

Litrature: